Well, no. Because this isn't really about Paul -- rather it's about Huckabee, who is willing to pluck a startlingly misogynistic quote out of the 1st century and act as though it still applies today.
Um... ok. I guess I was just thinking that if your objective is to comment on how out-of-date his (Huckabee) ideas are, you'd want to use the earliest possible date that quote was used. I agree that to some, those ideas seem quite old. I'm just suggesting you accurately identify their age because doing so actually helps punctuate your point.
4 comments:
Shouldn't you say, "Welcome to the 1st century" since he's paraphrasing the Apostle Paul?
Well, no. Because this isn't really about Paul -- rather it's about Huckabee, who is willing to pluck a startlingly misogynistic quote out of the 1st century and act as though it still applies today.
Um... ok. I guess I was just thinking that if your objective is to comment on how out-of-date his (Huckabee) ideas are, you'd want to use the earliest possible date that quote was used. I agree that to some, those ideas seem quite old. I'm just suggesting you accurately identify their age because doing so actually helps punctuate your point.
Doop! My bad. Punctuate away!
Post a Comment